Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Iuval Clejan's avatar

Good/bad seems to be about altruistic/selfish both in the original Dickens and in this new version? Except maybe in the new version, and your analysis, good also means good for oneself/and loved ones in the long term, whereas bad means good in the short term/bad in the long term, which is one aspect of addiction?

And is this just up to the individual? Both aspects are also dependent on the social environment. Capitalism has so far encouraged some selfishness and exploitation of others, not necessarily always in a conscious way, but sometimes in a what gets selected for, what has a competitive advantage in the marketplace kind of thing.

Native americans before contact with Europeans did not have much addiction, even though they knew about alcohol (though less strong than distilled forms), hallucinogens and tobacco, because their culture had healthier ways to get pleasure and connection.

Similarly, I think many addictions (I'll include pets in that, not because of negative long term consequences, but because they are a substitute for real human connection, substitution for a real need being another aspect of addiction) in present society would go away, if we still had functional villages/tribes/families/integrated individuals

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?